Are You Delivering What You’re Promising Online?

Share

The question sounds so simple that the answer should always be yes.

After all, if you promised to do something in real life, there’s a good chance you’d either do what you promised or you’d feel so guilty about not doing so that you’d either work away until you delivered on your promise or you’d grovel and apologise to the person you’d let down.

But so often things online don’t live up to the original promise. And there appears to be no guilt or remorse.

I was recently on a 90 webinar from a UK marketer who I’d previously thought was OK.

I’ve even spent money attending their courses.

So when I was sent an email promising a live training webinar I thought it would be worth attending.

Sure, I was expecting a pitch.

But not the amount of pitching that it turned out to have.

He announced at the start that it was going to be a 90 minute webinar.

Then he spent the first 40 minutes introducing things and pitching the event that it was promoting.

Oh and during that first part he went off to get a glass of water because he hadn’t even bothered to prepare to the extent of making sure he’d got a glass next to him before the webinar started.

Hmm.

No mention of the webinar being two thirds sales pitch from someone who didn’t care enough to be prepared in the sign-up email.

But he kept promising lots of golden nuggets, so I kept half-listening whilst browsing other things.

Eventually, the “information” arrived.

Five bullet points that he quickly listed and then claimed he was going to expand on.

Well, that was half right.

He did list them.

And he did kind-of expand on them for about 4 or 5 minutes each but with no real detail or examples. A thinly disguised sales pitch really.

Then the remaining 30 minutes or so was pitch for the live event again.

Which means he’s gone down in my opinion – a long way down.

And it means I’m unlikely to buy anything from him again.

Or attend another webinar because I’ll be expecting it to be just a pitch fest,

I’d have been happy with the usual 10 to 15 minutes of effectively talking about the weather whilst people joined, followed by about 40 to 50 minutes of real information and then 10 to 15 minutes of pitch.

But the sandwich was inside out and the content got lost behind the “you have to attend my live event, it’s the best thing you’ll ever do” pitch.

Especially since the live event was a 3 day event that was going to be the lead up to a longer, more intense, more expensive event.

Which put a big question in my mind as to whether the 3 day event would be equally light on information with a massive pitch for the longer event.

If you’re consciously or unconsciously doing that to your readers and subscribers – whether it’s via a webinar or your website or your email list or your reports and videos – then the same questions will be running through the minds of your potential customers.

Maybe they won’t be as up-front about it as I’ve been here. Although I’ve not told the person directly and I’ve deliberately not mentioned their name here so I’m not being very open about who was responsible.

More likely your potential customers will just mutter under their breath, possibly unsubscribe, probably read less of your emails and generally file you in their mind as being full of promises but not delivering.

Which is closer to what I’m doing with this person.

It’s very easy online to ignore someone or remove them from your life completely.

You unsubscribe from their list.

Or, much more likely, you just delete their emails without a second glance because it’s easier to do that than to click the unsubscribe link.

So you may never know why people aren’t responding or buying via you.

Go back through all your current things – use your stats or analytics to help with priorities – and read or listen or watch as though you were a new customer.

Would you be impressed?

Or would you be put off?

Then adjust accordingly.

It may be a pleasant, uplifting exercise.

Or it could be an eye opener.

I’m sure if the person pitching watched the webinar replay as though they were an attendee they’d be shocked.

Or at least I hope they’d be shocked.

But maybe not.

Maybe they’re just too focused on the money and not the results their customers get.

But it’s the tip of the iceberg – take your eye off the customers for too long and they’ll vote with their feet (ask Tesco about doing that here in the UK) and you won’t have a business.

It would have been very easy for the webinar to be mostly content.

My gut reaction is that it would have got more sales – I was taught by Ken McCarthy to give as much information as possible away in sales letters because it people got value and felt they’d get even more value from the full product.

That works.

And it also works in reverse as you can tell from this rant!

If you’ve got any thoughts on this that you’d like to share (just don’t mention names please) then please use the comments box below or drop me a message.

Share

5 thoughts on “Are You Delivering What You’re Promising Online?

  1. Alex Newell

    I get the impression Trevor that you are mighty peeved!

    I also get the impression that you did not “Deliver”!

    You did not name him!

    I double dog dare you!!

    🙂

    Alex

    1. Trevor Dumbleton Post author

      Hi Alex, not a happy bunny but not going to publicly name – sorry!

      Took it as a learning exercise and did other things whilst half listening to the pitch so not entirely a waste of time.

  2. Roy A. Jones

    Hi Trevor, I tip my hat to you. I do not believe in mentioning names when you are ranting about their bad behavior. On the other hand I love mentioning their names when I’m bragging about someone. 😀

    I used to attend a lot of webinars but some of them are plain and simply a waste of time. And to top it off you see in the comment section where people are typing “This is the best info ever”. Huh What Did I miss something? Like you said you get maybe 15 minutes of B.S. info that everybody already knows anyway followed by 45 to 60 minutes of sales pitch. Don’t get me wrong there are still some who give damn good webinars but they seem to be a rare breed nowadays.

    I always try to teach my people to give their list exactly what they would want. If you don’t like them pushy sales letters that bombard your inbox everyday with buy this crap or buy this thing that I don’t know how good it is because I haven’t bought it then why in the world you market to your list that way. Soft selling is the best approach. It is what I like to see in my inbox so that is what I send out and what I want my followers to be sending out to their email lists.

    I also teach if your subject line says “Free Gift” Then have a link with that free gift and don’t have it attached to some stupid sales pitch. You’ll get that sale another day. Don’t just deliver what you promise, if possible always always always over deliver.

    1. Trevor Dumbleton Post author

      Hi Roy,

      Naming names when they’ve been good is a great policy.

      This webinar wasn’t directly in the internet marketing arena, it was just using it to push a live event at a similar price to internet marketing events.

      It’s not the first webinar he’s done by any means – they’re regular events for him but they seem to be getting further and further away from giving any useful information.

      I tend to avoid most webinars for the same reasons you say – life’s too short to listen to so much waffle!

      Soft selling is a direction I try to stay in, I probably don’t always succeed but it’s certainly the aim. And over delivery is definitely an aim as well – there’s so much good information available that I think you have to exceed people’s expectations just to stay in the game.

      Misleading subject lines bug me lots – there seems to be a rash of “you’ve just earned a commission” type ones recently and I almost always unsubscribe from thos.

  3. Patricia Santhuff

    Good rant. I vote in favor of naming also — just because you’d name him if he’d been great, wouldn’t you??

    But what i really wanted to say is that I feel the same way about Bonuses as you do about “free gifts.” It’s fine when the bonus is a genuine overdelivery gift, it’s NOT fine when it’s merely another way to market to you and get you on someone else’s email list. That’s not a bonus IMO, it’s more marketing.

Comments are closed.